It was reported Wednesday that Three Arrows Capital, a crypto-hedge fund, was liquidated in the British Virgin Islands. The Monetary Authority of Singapore, (MAS), has reprimanded 3AC following this alleged liquidation for misleading regulators. Reports claim liquidators are trying to take the assets of Su Zhu, the co-founder of 3AC, and his wife.
3AC of misleading regulators and exacerbating AUM limits is charged by the Monetary Authority of Singapore
Three Arrows Capital Ltd., also known as 3AC, is seeing regulators in Singapore facing problems with its troubled cryptocurrency hedge fund Three Arrows Capital Ltd. Since 2012, 3AC was a well known crypto hedge fund that was started by two former Credit Suisse traders — Su Zhu Kyle Davies. However, after being quite successful, 3AC allegedly invested heavily into Terra’s LUNA after Zhu insisted that crypto companies “don’t want to be blown out during a supercycle.” It is assumed that one issue 3AC dealt with was an investment of $200 million locked luna classic (LUNC) which is now worth less than $1K.
“You don’t want to get blown out by a supercycle.”@zhusu @UpOnlyTVWith @cobie @ledgerstatus pic.twitter.com/fYqCXukGNN
— Gabriel Haines.eth (@gabrielhaines) June 30, 2022
“There is speculation that the massive losses of [LUNC] caused them to use more leverage to earn it back — Also known as ‘Revenge trading,’” one account explainedOn June 16, Two weeks ago, The Block’s Frank Chaparro cited sources that said the crypto hedge fund 3AC was liquidated for $400 million. The same week, reports indicate that Bitmex, Bitfinex and Deribit dissolved 3AC. Sources noted two days ago, that a British Virgin Islands (BVI) court liquidated the hedge fund’s assets as well, but the sources did not disclose what type of assets were allegedly seized.
After the alleged BVI liquidation notice was published, the Monetary Authority of Singapore released a press release stating that 3AC misled regulators. “The Monetary Authority of Singapore today reprimanded Three Arrows Capital Pte. Ltd. (3AC) for providing false information to MAS and exceeding the assets under management (AUM) threshold allowed for a registered fund management company (RFMC),” the press release reveals. The MAS violation notice mentions that the regulator has been investigating 3AC’s contraventions “since June 2021.”
3AC was also charged with violating the MAS assets under Management (AUM). “[3AC] exceeded its allowable AUM of S$250 million for a RFMC between July 2020 and September 2020 and between November 2020 and August 2021,” the Singapore regulators detailed. “In light of recent developments which call into question the solvency of the fund managed by [3AC]MAS will now assess if any further breaches occurred by [3AC] of MAS’ regulations,” the MAS officials added.
Local Report Claims Liquidators Look to Seize Su Zhu’s Million-Dollar Bungalows
Moreover, a local report from Singapore say “rumors” have claimed that liquidators have been eyeing 3AC’s homes and property located in the country. The publication Edgeprop’s reporter Cecilia Chow detailed that records show from 2019 to 2021, Su Zhu purchased three bungalows in Singapore that cost him around $83.55 million.
The Singapore properties are allegedly in Zhu’s name and his wife’s name as well. In December, Zhu and his wife purchased a 31,863 sq ft home called the “Good Class Bungalow (GCB).” Chow’s report notes that the GCB property was put into a trust for one of Zhu’s daughters.
Chow further details that Zhu’s wife owns a $28.5 million bungalow in Singapore located near the Botanic Gardens at Dalvey Road. The property was acquired in September 2020 and the reporter notes that it is “currently under construction.” The Edgeprop report claims that 3AC and associates collectively own “five high-end properties.”
Chow further says that members of the 3AC team also own an entire fleet of “high-end cars and a yacht.” The well known Terra whistleblower named Fatman has been sharing information about the alleged liquidators in Singapore. Fatman also shared information about the alleged liquidators in Singapore. claimsA source informed him that Su Zhu desperately wants to sell the home worth a million dollars in Singapore.
“A verified source has confirmed that Su Zhu is urgently trying to sell his $35m house in Singapore, currently held in his [daughter’s] trust,” Fatman tweeted. “He is requesting the funds to be transferred to a bank account in Dubai and has no intention of paying creditors with the proceeds from the sale.”
Furthermore, a post on social media shows how Zhu once claimed 100,000 ether was “dust” to him. “Today, he is selling 10 USDC, trying to pay off debt after his $20 [billion]Fund collapsed. Markets always humble those too arrogant,” the individual who published the social media post explained. “Today, he is sending all the [leftover]He wants to transfer as much cash as possible from his pockets to CEX in order for him get more money. He just transferred 10 USDC, 3.98 AAVE ($200), 138 SUSHI, 0.1 YFI, 2.5 COMP ($75) and other actual ‘dust’ to various [centralized] exchanges,” the individual added.
Zhu is still at large. tweeted since June 14, 2022. Zhu has changed his Twitter profile as it was used to say that the co-founder of 3AC was “Investing in BTC, ETH, AVAX, LUNA, SOL, NEAR, MINA, DOT, [and] KSM.” Today, Zhu’s Twitter profile does not feature the aforementioned crypto assets and simply says “bitcoin,” in addition to his associations with Deribit, Defiance Capital, and Starry Night Capital.
What do you think about the recent MAS press release and the story that says liquidators are attempting to seize Su Zhu’s properties in Singapore? Please comment below to let us know your thoughts on this topic.
Image creditShutterstock. Pixabay. Wiki Commons
DisclaimerThis information is provided for educational purposes only. This article is not intended to be a solicitation or offer to sell or buy any product, service, or company. Bitcoin.com is not a provider of investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. The author and the company are not responsible for any loss or damage caused or alleged caused by the content or use of any goods, services, or information mentioned in the article.